The comic that inspired the review that inspired this post |
"You can tell me about the runs from Alan Moore or the revived series from
2011 and that's great. ... But... Youngblood is a team that does not deserve all the hard work
of creators!...
Let Youngblood die!"
So because the original series was bad, no one should every work
on it? Alan Moore's first superhero comic, Marvelman, was a sequel to a series that was about a bland superhero series no cared about prior.
"It's just bunch of unmemorable rip-off character growling
and grinding teeth and saying really stupid things and squinting and doing
over-exaggerated poses and that c***."
While I agree his art is bad, you have to keep his art in
context. His art style was the style popular in the '90s (when the comic was
made). Like fashions, comic art styles aren't immune to becoming outdated as is
the case of Rob's art.
And yes, a lot of his characters are inspired or based on other
characters. However, good creators have done this in successful and beloved
series. For example, the following creators did so: Alan Moore (whose famous Watchmen characters are based on Charlton
Comics’ superhero line), Grant Morrison (who wrote the Flex Mentallo and Zenith comics, which feature tons of homages to
other characters) and Bob Kane (who based Batman on the likes of Zorro and the
Shadow).
"Rob Liefeld does not deserve the amount
of loyalty he has engendered. What's that? 'Rob Liefeld
is really enthusiastic about the industry and is really awesome guy if you
know him in person and love comics and everything about the medium?' ... I am
enthusiastic about the medium and no one says I should
be drawing comic books!"
Barring rare exceptions, no one is asked to write or draw comic
books. You have to work to get to make comics. Liefeld, unlike
Linkara, actually did go through the trials of becoming comic creator. That
combined with his enthusiasm for his job is why people like him.
"Rob Liefeld can't write. Rob Liefeld can't draw. Rob
Liefeld can't create! Don't go telling me about how he created Deadpool and
Cable. 1) He didn't "create' Deadpool. He created some boring-a**
mercenary that spoke in yellow-colored speech bubbles. No one would give a d***
about him if not for the work of everyone else, but him. As for Cable, ... you
found one, all of one, character that Rob Liefeld created that's actually good
except a good creator is capable of creating more than one good
character. Liefeld, on the other hand, settles on creating sixty thousand
characters and none of them are good."
Paraphrasing from the TvTropes page “Sturgeon's Law”, most of what is produce
is complete garbage. So, how can a creator possibly create good characters 100%
of the time? Do people call one-hit wonder musicians (Carl Douglas, Bobby
Pickett and the band A-ha) lazy? No, because they were able create masterpieces
even once.
As for Deadpool, yes, the character did not become popular until
it was in other people’s hands. However, the X-Men didn't become popular until
Chris Claremont rebooted him. Yet, Linkara said Stan Lee created the
X-Men.
"Companies stop giving him work."
So because Linkara doesn't like his work, he should
NEVER be allowed to work in comics ever again? Because he created a bunch
of terrible characters? By that logic, all creators should never get work
since every creator creates characters someone thinks are bad.
"Liefeld and his ilk ruined entire generation of comic
artists."
Then, explain this: "A lot of artist managed to break free
of that style when they realized how awful it looked". This quote is from
Linkara's review of Newmen issue 1.
While I agree that Rob Liefeld is not that good of a creator, I
still think this argument against him was ridiculous. However, I am not saying
I don’t value Linkara or his show. I am saying he should have thought his
argument out better.
No comments:
Post a Comment